Donald asks…
romeo and juliet help? easy 10 points!?
my teacher said we could use the internet for ones we don't know so please only answer if you know some of these and don't joke around and tell me the wrong answer lol
TRUE OR FALSE:
1. juliet tell her mother that she will look at paris with the intention of liking him
2. romeo and his friends wear masks to the capulet feast
3. in the fight with tybalt, mercutio is the first to draw his sword
4. when explaining the deaths of mercutio and tybalt, benvolio places the blame on romeo
MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. after stopping the fight, the prince says that if a capulet or montague disturb the peace again, the punishment will be
a. death b. banishment c. imprisonment d. enslavement
2. according to romeo, which of the following does NOT describe his love:
a. a fire sparkling in lovers' eyes
b. roses blooming in lovers' cheeks
c. a sea nourished with lovers' tears
d. smoke made with the fume of sighs
3. when questioned by juliet (balcony scene) romeo claims the he received advice from:
a. juliet's nurse b. mercutio c. tybalt d. love
4. initially, during the fight with tybalt, romeo:
a. encourages mercutio to fight with gusto
b. runs for help
c. begs them to stop because the prince has forbidden fighting
d. begs tybalt to fight him rather than mercutio
5. when the nurse tells juliet the romeo killed tybalt, juliet's first response is:
a. "O, how can he hide such an evil heart with such a beautiful face?"
d. "To tell the truth, handsome montague, i'm too fond of you"
IF YOU ANSWER ALL OR MOST OF THEM CORRECTLY I WILL GIVE YOU TEN POINTS!
and there were 50 questions btw so i read it, i just don't remember the little details like these
admin answers:
T or F
1. T
2. T
3. T
4. F
1. B ( I think..maybe a?)
2. D
3. D
4. C
5. A
You should have read it. It really is very good
Daniel asks…
i need some romeo and juliet help. easy 10 points!?
my teacher said we could use the internet for ones we don't know so please only answer if you know some of these and don't joke around and tell me the wrong answer lol
TRUE OR FALSE:
1. juliet tell her mother that she will look at paris with the intention of liking him
2. romeo and his friends wear masks to the capulet feast
3. in the fight with tybalt, mercutio is the first to draw his sword
4. when explaining the deaths of mercutio and tybalt, benvolio places the blame on romeo
MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. after stopping the fight, the prince says that if a capulet or montague disturb the peace again, the punishment will be
a. death b. banishment c. imprisonment d. enslavement
2. according to romeo, which of the following does NOT describe his love:
a. a fire sparkling in lovers' eyes
b. roses blooming in lovers' cheeks
c. a sea nourished with lovers' tears
d. smoke made with the fume of sighs
3. when questioned by juliet (balcony scene) romeo claims the he received advice from:
a. juliet's nurse b. mercutio c. tybalt d. love
4. initially, during the fight with tybalt, romeo:
a. encourages mercutio to fight with gusto
b. runs for help
c. begs them to stop because the prince has forbidden fighting
d. begs tybalt to fight him rather than mercutio
5. when the nurse tells juliet the romeo killed tybalt, juliet's first response is:
a. "O, how can he hide such an evil heart with such a beautiful face?"
d. "To tell the truth, handsome montague, i'm too fond of you"
IF YOU ANSWER ALL OR MOST OF THEM CORRECTLY I WILL GIVE YOU TEN POINTS!
admin answers:
This is surely a tougher way to find out these answers than it would be to simply read this short play.
If you want to read it, you can find it at http://www.enotes.com ...where you put 'Shakespeare at enotes' (without quote marks) in the search box. Then look for "read Shakespeare's plays" if you see the 'home' page on Shakespeare, in grayish-blue, small print: that's a link to his plays.
If you just see a list of his plays right away, use the grayish-blue link to 'Romeo and Juliet' and look at the right to find a 'side-by-side' text, so you can read both the original and the way it's said now, 'regular' English for easier reading...
But okay, if you trust my memory... Am not going to read this play again since I've done so a great many times:
[ADD: Okay, I went myself to enotes (again) and checked all these things; am a member there and that makes it easier, though I read very quickly and only see two changes]:
1. True
[ADD: Your first answerer is right in that, though Juliet tells mom she'll 'look at Paris,' Juliet has NO 'intention to like him.' So it's false.]
2. True, everyone wore masks, it was a masked ball
3. True, and called Romeo a coward as well
4. ADD: false; Benvolio tries to say it was all his own fault
...
1. A. Death
2. Think it's d. Smoke made w/the fume of sighs... Doesn't sound right, not at all like Shakespeare...
3. A. Juliet's nurse
4. C. Begs them to stop
5. ADD: It's a. Though Juliet says "a serpent's heart" rather than an "evil heart"..."hid by a beautiful face."
It's now my least favorite of all Shakespeare's plays. Juliet, Romeo, Nurse, parents, friends and Friar all are extremely foolish in this play. Pfft.
George asks…
Why do people answer religious questions with a non-religious answer?
CrG wrote 'How limited is your understanding. I wish I had the inclination and the strength to answer all of your petty objections. Everything you quote is true. Your conclusions are false. Read what Isaiah says about Jesus.
Where in Isaiah should this guy look? And if you're so sure his conclusions are false then you have a religious obligation to say more than you did. And if his conclusions are wrong according to you then are any conclusions he draws, from reading Isaiah, after you suggested it, be wrong?
If you answer a question in the capacity of Christian, do so with authority...don't put your foot in your mouth!
I agree with most of what MuslimRose~Amir wrote/concluded and can think of verses in the Bible that agree...OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD! The Book of Isaiah is 66 Chapters long and extremely controversial in many areas among some of the greatest and most revered scholars in the world. In the least, any argument should use one of them.
Oh! Wait! I Am Not A Christian. I gave that up a few years ago. I served it well for over 19 years though.
Mark 10:18-19 In the same breath Messiah continued to speak about the Law (Zec. 5:6 The ephah = the standard of perfection or moral ruler) cf. Gal. 3:24 The Law is our Teacher; I John. 3:4
John 5:30 Only by ASSUMING the Messiah was completely human can this verse be taken literally or figuratively! There is no in between. If Messiah can ever NOT do something then he is not all powerful, not God, and a HUMAN! "As I hear, I judge" Judge what? According to the Law. Messiah was a priest of the Temple. Many people don't know that. He taught in the Temple and Synagogues on a regular basis and was revered as a great teacher of Jews! Only a Jew learned in the Law, and a lover of the Law could EVER get respect among such a viciously religious community. "and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of my Father." The ultimate existence of any human (INCLUDING MESSIAH) is Ecc. 12:13...to observe the Law
I will pay you $10,000 to show me a verse in the Bible(KJV) or (BOY) that says:
1.do not keep the law
2. do not try to keep the law
3. no human can keep the law
4. Messiah was not human
John 14:31 Messiah never did anything contrary to Yahweh's will/plan/ or law! There is no Biblical argument against this!...did you know there is a Law, of the 613 Laws as prescribed by Moses (Mosheh) that commands us not to add to nor take away from the Law?(Deut. 4:2) or that Messiah said the Law would always be here and that he came here to magnify it? (Matt. 5:17-20) "till heaven and earth pass away?" Only advocates of Satan and the Beastly Governmental System believe that we don't need the Law because there is no commandment contrary to the many, MANY commandments to keep, observe, love, and study the Law. and...Matt 5:5 says the meek will inherit the earth! So the earth will never be destroyed...and neither will the Law!
John 14:10 Only easy to get Rose's conclusion if we continue on the foundation that Messiah was human, and not part of the Trinity, or somehow God. Anyone who is 'close' to their higher power would say this! I am in Him, and He is in me. Does that mean they are members of the same Trinity? I wonder how most Christians can believe in the Doctrine of the Trinity when it is not taught in Scripture? For Messiah to claim that Yahweh was 'in him' he would have to prove a few things:
1. that he was free from sin (I John 3:6)
2. that he kept the Law in order to fulfill the prophecies concerning himself, namely the Laws of the Priesthood and the office of High Priest. There are clear examples of specific Laws being kept by Messiah's parents in just the first two chapters of Luke (ie. circumcision on the 8th day, name by the Law, Luke 2:22=Lev. 12:2-5, Luke 2:23=Lev. 27.2,8,25, Luke 2:24=Ex.34:19-20, Luke 2:41-42=Ex.23:14-17....These are less than half of the Laws kept in these two chapters. Positive Laws 215,114,52, etc.
sin = I John 3:4 = breaking the Law
I John 5:2 "by this we know that we love the children of Yahweh: When we love Yahweh BY KEEPING HIS LAW..."
Philippians 2:6 KJV and Thayer's Greek Lexicon
(being) to begin below
(form) external appearance, fig. cf. Gen. 1:26 and Ex. 34:6-7 (this is
the image of Yahweh)
(not) no, not; in direct questions expecting an
affirmative answer
(robbery) a thing to be seized upon or to be held fast, retained
Phil. 2:6 Who, created, like Yahweh, would usurp equality of Yahweh?!
The answer is NO ONE BUT...
Satan! Isa. 14:13
Every Christian should read, The Two Babylons, http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/babylons/default.htm by Rev. Alexander Hislop
I cannot believe I am even going to mention Mat 24:36 but here goes...
Yahshua Messiah said that no man knows that day nor hour... let me rephrase that portion of the verse for easier understanding...people do not understand sin, what it is, why it is, and fewer people think that
the air i breath...something that does exist even though it cannot be seen, has been proven to exist by modern science
admin answers:
For the same reason that many people answer non religious questions with religious answers id presume, woudlnt you
Lizzie asks…
How is my new yugioh spellcaster deck?
The strategy of this deck is a lockdown/control type of strategy. Secret village and royal decree help me when it comes to stopping my opponents spells and traps while I can draw and special summon a bit easy, I also use chaos command magician to negate opponents monster effects that target him and dark red enchanter for hand destruction. Anyways, how is my deck?
Monsters: (20)
dark magician
2x skilled dm
chaos command magician
dark red enchanter
2x magical exempler
2x defender, the magical knight
3x apprentice magician
2x crystal seer
2x old vindictive magician
2x night's end sorcerer
breaker
the tricky
Spells: (15)
3x magical dimension
2x secret village of the spellcaster
2x book of moon
terraforming
mst
heavy storm
monster reborn
arcane barrier
lightning vortex
swords of revealing light
pot of avarice
Traps: (5)
2x royal decree
threatening roar
tt
magicians circle
Extra deck: (15) (i dont have all of these cards n my extra deck, but i do have most of them)
3x stardust
red dragon archfiend
dark strike fighter
colossal fighter
arcanite magician
black rose
tempest magician
gaia knight
iron chain dragon
2x magical android
2x armory arm
admin answers:
Take out chaos command magician
Thomas asks…
What is "Biological Citizenship"?
What is an easy to understand definition of biological citizenship? (Mostly according to Nikolas Rose's writings - which I find long and drawn out ... )
And, if possible, please also tell me how building geriatric prisons is related to biological citizenship?
admin answers:
A new kind of citizenship is taking shape in the age of biomedicine, biotechnology
and genomics. We term this ‘biological citizenship’.1 Since Marshall’s (1950)
classic essay it is conventional to think of a kind of evolution of citizenship since the
eighteenth century in Europe, North America and Australia: the civil rights granted in
the eighteenth century necessitated the extension of political citizenship in the
nineteenth century and of social citizenship in the twentieth century.2 This
perspective is useful, to the extent that it breaks with political-philosophical
considerations of citizenship and locates citizenship within the political history of
‘citizenship projects’. By citizenship projects, we mean the ways that authorities
thought about (some) individuals as potential citizens, and the ways they tried to act
upon them. For example: defining those who were entitled to participate in the
political affairs
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment